Time and pace are directly related to the reality effect
because it is something that is structured and obeyed regularly in our everyday
lives. When a simulation follows the pattern of the real, it becomes more real
to us as a participatory audience. A great example of this would be The Matrix.
In The Matrix, Agent Smith explains that there was a previous version of The
Matrix where the world was created as a utopia. The rendering was green fields
and blue skies. There was no human suffering, war, poverty, etc. However in this version of The Matrix, the
enslaved human race began to rebel. Even on a subconscious level the human race
was unable to believe that what was happening before them was real. As a result
of this The Matrix underwent a “system update” and was changed to reflect human
conditions as we know them today. The simulation introduced certain human influences
such as hard labor, disease, inequality; the parts of our suffering that make
humanism real. This idea relates well to ideas regarding time and pace as it
relates to the reality effect. The closer action on stage adheres to real time,
the more real it becomes for the audience. If a character decides he must leave
to go and take a shower, walks off stage left, and enters again in 60 seconds,
no one in the audience is going to believe that man left to go take a shower.
However, if a character decides to take a shower, walks off stage left, and
enters in the next 10 minutes with wet hair and a change of clothes, this
action becomes infinitely more believable to the audience. There is a much more
powerful effect when we see a performance happening in real time. When we are
fully engaged in a show and are seeing everything happen before our eyes, we
know that we are not missing out on anything occurring on stage. Our experience
becomes a shared experience with the character we are following. We get to see
everything the exact way that character sees it, without leaving any of the
action behind. In terms of pace, it is easy for an audience to question the
authenticity of a performance when we see that natural speech patterns and
movements are not implemented in a performance. When a question is asked most
times we expect a character to stop and think of a response. If the character
answers right away, we know that the even happening before us is merely an
illusion. While this can sometimes be effective, it is only truly effective
when the world of the play is not one that is similar to the real world. There
is a film that was made recently called Boyhood. Boyhood is the story of a boy
as he ages from 5 to 18 years old. What is so interesting about the production
of this film is that it was filmed over the course of 12 years in order to
captures the boy’s growth into adulthood. The entire cast of characters signed
on to be filmed in what is essentially real time so that they could see this
one boy become a man in real time. What I find most interesting about this
experience is that while this tactic was intending to be used to capture the
boy’s growth, I strongly believe that it served another purpose as well. I am
certain that in filming the picture for 12 years, the relationships between
each of the characters became more real as well. If two cast members, a father
and a son are expected to have a relationship, that relationship is much more
synthetic when the characters are only filmed for a few months. However, when
the two cast members are engaged in a working relationship for an extended period
of time, it is undoubted that their relationship becomes much more real for
them as actors, and therefore, it becomes real for the audience as well.
Monday, October 27, 2014
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Prompt 7
If
I were to take a theatrical performance, and convert to a show worthy of
environmental theatre, I would choose Eurydice as this show. I would choose
this because it is the text with which I am most familiar at this point and
also because there are so many strong design choices, especially in terms of
set, that would lend itself to something site-specific. In terms of the dialogue,
I believe that not much would need to change. Although environmental theatre
does not rely heavily on text, in this scenario I would actually add various dialogues
for the different parts of the show. In Eurydice, there are many events that
occur at about the same time. However due to the nature of a theatrical
production, these events are seen in sequence. In adapting the show, I would
allow for these events to occur at the same time. For example, Orpheus would be
in a room upstairs writing or playing music, writing letters, succumbing to his
depression, etc. Meanwhile in the basement, Eurydice’s father would be teaching
Eurydice the various lessons that are mentioned in the script. You would get to
see a lot more of Orpheus’s decline and much more of Eurydice and the Father’s
relationship becoming stronger. In terms of set, I would stage the performance
in a house. The audience would start in on the first floor and would see the
first scene where Orpheus and Eurydice get engaged. After this, the audience
would be invited into the next room where the wedding would be taking place.
There would be party guests being greeted by Eurydice while Orpheus is nowhere
to be found. Also the audience at this point would be invited into the basement
and the second floor. In the basement would be the underworld with several
pipes dripping water, a river running through a section, and several stones,
three of which would be endowed with speaking parts. Here would also be the “business
section of the Underworld where the dad would go to work. On the second floor
is Orpheus’ room where he writes music and letters. There would be a piano
there. Also on the second floor is the Lord of the Underworld’s high-rise
apartment. Between Orpheus’ room and the Underworld would be a pneumatic tube
with which letters would be passed between the underworld and the world above. When
the third act occurs, all the patrons of the show would unite in the basement
and watch the great ascension. They would see the failure and the conclusion of
the play down in the Underworld. I believe that this show would have a very powerful
affect on the audience, especially with interactions between the stones, the
wedding scene, the incessant musical interludes from Orpheus’ room, and with
the terrifying intrusions of the Lord of the Underworld.
I
do believe with Kantor’s view on theatre. I believe that an audience who goes
to a stage production knows exactly what they are going to get. This is much
like going to a blockbuster hit at the movie theater. When the process becomes
interactive with the audience a performance then does not break the fourth wall
but transcends it, evolving from a two dimensional performance to a three dimensional
performance. In the same way, when you go on a “ride” at Universal Studios that
brings the action directly to you, a film then transcends the same type of
boundary.
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Blog Prompt 6
In
my personal opinion, there is no way that the use of new technology will dilute
theatre into an entirely obsolete form of performance. There is a clear desire
for our culture move towards these newer mediums, but theatre is held together
but something that makes it entirely unique. New technology can never take
presence away from theatre. There is an important bond between a performer and
an audience that only occurs when the two are sharing the same space. There is
no other medium in the world that can match a face to face experience. While
there is a demand for instant gratification, there is also a strong demand for
honesty and believability in our art forms. The idea that we are witnessing
something raw and untarnished first hand is very powerful, and it is because of
this that people will always be drawn to stage performance. This does not mean,
however, that these new mediums should not be introduced and blended with the
events happening before our eyes. I believe the best way to use this tactic is in
the form of an illusion. Any film based artistic work grew out the spectacle of
film being real, and also not real. I imagine that if we reintroduce the
novelty of other mediums into film, it could have a very powerful effect.
Imagine a girl on stage stands in front of a mirror, and the girl in the mirror
is identical to the former. Then imagine the girl who is present in the space
begins to play with her hair, but the mirrored image does not reproduce her
actions. She instead points, and laughs. This is an idea that can only be
brought to life by a new medium, and using ideas like this we can improve
theatre in a way that makes it more impactful for the audience. The use of new
mediums in theatre can enhance a performance by providing more information that
puts the audience in the mind of the character. The second part of this prompt
brings to mind those "save a starving child" add you often see during
commercials. I personally have no experience with starving children, or with a
world where it seems impossible to receive the care and nourishment necessary
for survival. However, I still am filled with enormous guilt and sympathy when
that commercial comes on. Rather, this is how I feel at first. After seeing the
same commercial over and over again, the impact becomes less and less. I think
if I were to see the poor starving child in person, that experience once could
do more to move me than one hundred ads of the same scenario.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)